Home / Commentary  / Take a long, hard look at John Chiang for California governor

Take a long, hard look at John Chiang for California governor

All voters in the state, should give John Chiang a serious look

John Chiang. Photo courtesy of John Chiang.

John Chiang: ‘…we need to have a real conversation about … why Black Lives Matter’

The Sacramento Bee reported Thursday, that gubernatorial candidate John Chiang has lost the endorsement of a Los Angeles law enforcement union after he said California must have tough conversations about the excessive use of force by law enforcement and consider changes to how the state investigates officer-involved shootings.

“As a state, we must rethink the way we police, from where and how we recruit officers, to the training we provide them,” Chiang said in a statement. “From ensuring de-escalation is the first step, not an afterthought, to providing police departments with the tools necessary to do the job right. Ultimately, we need to have a real conversation about the root of this problem and why Black Lives Matter.”

Chiang’s courageous comments came in the aftermath of the shooting of Stephon Clark, the unarmed Black man who was killed by Sacramento police last month. Chiang’s comments were “dead right.” The callous, indiscriminate massacre of Black males must cease! Or it will morph into something horrid for the state and nation.

We will leave that there. Everyone knows what we mean.

The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs initially endorsed Chiang, but rescinded the endorsement, citing his public comments. Obviously, they don’t want to be scrutinized. Obviously, they believe it’s alright to shoot first; ask questions later.

Well, to hell with that! It’s not alright.

The union’s board president, Ron Hernandez, calls Chiang’s concern, “opportunism.”

“Incidents like the officer-involved shooting in Sacramento is heartbreaking for all involved, but blaming officers first is not an answer to the issues facing the communities we are sworn to protect and serve,” wrote Hernandez in a letter to Chiang. “While we are certain that there are those who would celebrate your statement on the issue, we regret the divisiveness and apparent opportunism of your approach. Please remove our association from your list of supporters.”

Chiang told the Sacramento Bee, he’d liked to have kept the endorsement, but the conversation about police use of force and misconduct is more important. He said he was not blaming officers, but insisting a dialogue is necessary for change.

This required courage on Chiang’s part. And for that, Black American voters, indeed all voters in the state, should give John Chiang a serious look.

Compton Herald is a digital news publication providing clear, fair and current news, information and commentary about Compton and the Los Angeles metropolitan area of California, and the world.

2 COMMENTS
  • Alex Kennedy May 29, 2018

    For what it is worth, I agree — “California must have tough conversations about the excessive use of force by law enforcement and consider changes to how the state investigates officer-involved shootings.” But what is going to be changed, and why? Chiang has yet to tell us.

    The shooting of Stephon Clark is a very poor example. Clark had a history of robbery, burglary, and assault. He was evading arrest after breaking into a number of vehicles. After running from police, he foolishly attempted to pretend that he was armed. He should have surrendered.

    There are examples of police abuse, but if BLM is going to be making a case for change, citing to Clark and similar anecdotal incidents is misplaced. Making Clark into some modern-day martyr underscores why BLM and its neo-Marxist leadership cannot be trusted.

  • RDF.Ph.D. May 3, 2018

    Antonio Villaraigosa, candidate for governor is a subject of Evidentiary Analytics’ preliminary investigation of an illegal enterprise among the California Tax Allocation Committee, Bridge Housing Corporation, and other entities, including HUD and the IRS. Publication of findings is in progress. Investigators are former HUD and corporate managers. Documentation of disability discrimination, non-consensual medical experimental on unwary Latino residents, falsification of official documents, pay to play contracts with contractors, and defective construction.is substantiated, He is ignoring evidence of an “Affordable Gitmo” culture. Investigators are former HUD and corporate fraud prosecution managers.

Join the conversation!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.